Commissioner for Insurance Fola Daniel |
Acting DG PenCom Mrs Chinelo Anohu-Amazu |
Chuks Udo Okonta
Life Insurance companies seem not to
be taking full advantage of
the opportunities provided by the Pension Reform Act (PRA), as they are sluggishly trailing behind Pension Fund Administrators (PFAs) who are dominating the business of retirement and terminal benefits.
the opportunities provided by the Pension Reform Act (PRA), as they are sluggishly trailing behind Pension Fund Administrators (PFAs) who are dominating the business of retirement and terminal benefits.
According to the National Pension Commission (PenCom),
as at the end of February 2014, 84,097 retirees are receiving their monthly
pensions by programme withdrawal that is administered by pension fund
administrators, while a paltry sum of 8,479 retirees get theirs by annuity
offered by life insurers.
Insurers have hinged their inability
to break into the market on de-marketing by pension operators, an allegation
the operators have denied.
Industry observers, who are not
pleased with the situation, have called on insurers to stop lamenting, but be
proactive in marketing and design of good products.
Director-General Nigerian Insurers Association
(NIA), Sunday Thomas, urged insurance operators to fight the alleged de-marketing
of annuity business by pension funds administrators through development of good
products that suit the needs of retirees.
He noted that insurers and pension operators
ought not to fight over annuity and programme withdrawal as the law has specified
the roles to be played by the operators.
He said the menace would have stemmed from the
operators' lack of adequate knowledge of how the two businesses operate, adding
that they were designed to complement each other.
He said: “When we heard of the issue of de-marketing
between the operators, I had cause to write to PenCom and copied NAICOM. I
believe it is due to lack of adequate knowledge of the subject.
"I happened to be among those who were
instrumental to give effect to the law, when I was with NAICOM. And annuity was
not designed to be a conflict between the institutions. But the problem may
probably be due to lack of proper understanding. The two are supposed to complement
each other.
"The role of programme withdrawal is totally
different from life annuity. There was a time the former Director-General of
PenCom, was encouraging insurance companies to come up with products that will
attract retirees and he gave a figure of which out of the total number of
retirees, it was very small number that went by way of life annuity.
"If I am an operator, de-marketing will not
bother me too much, all I need to do, is come up with good products that would
sufficiently be endeared in the minds of the retirees. I would go ahead and
market the products and engage in public awareness."
He noted that the association would intensify
efforts on creating awareness on annuity and its importance in the life of a
worker.
The National Pension Commission (PenCom) has also
called on insurers to intensify efforts in marketing annuity business instead
of complaining of de-marketing.
PenCom said the complain by some life insurers
that they are denied annuity business by PFAs is uncalled-for as the Pension
Reform Acts (PRA) 2004, has spelt out the roles to be played
life insurers and PFAs in managing retirement funds.
No comments:
Post a Comment